Soupy End to Indian Sharks

Jun 22, 2011
-A +A

India lands an estimated 70,000 tonnes of sharks annually, and they eat none of it.

1021 Photo credit: Jessica King, Marine Photobank

Thomas and Arulsingh, fishermen who hail from Kanyakumari, hauled up their nets and fishing lines on a beach in southern India. The catch was special and I was privileged, as an outsider, to be invited to watch as this enormous fish was sliced, its fin, the most valuable part, handled with extreme care.

The shark fin, I was told, would fetch a lot of money, despite the fact that it was not a hammerhead, which fetches the best price. Nevertheless, the fishermen revealed, there were several more where this one came from, and they could be caught easily using specialised hooks and lines.

Eighteen species of sharks, including two species of hammerheads, spadenose, requiem and milk sharks, are often landed, among an estimated 70 species, for fins or meat from Indian waters. Different parts of the Indian coast have different species compositions of sharks, with the northwest reporting large proportions of spadenose sharks, hammerheads along the south west coast, and requiem, hammerheads and milk sharks along the east coast. Sharks are usually brought to shore before finning and the flesh is consumed locally while the fins are exported to South-east Asian markets.

Shark fins reportedly sell for about US$80 in the wholesale market, which is considered a handsome price as compared to the time and effort spent in catching fish, which are usually sold for a quarter of the price. As the capture of sharks is not banned in India, the practice of finning, which is shunned in several other countries, occurs in broad daylight here. A friend recently reported seeing an auto-rickshaw (tuk-tuk) stuffed with fins to the point where the driver was hidden from view, on a busy street in the French-influenced town of Pondicherry, south India.

1022 A tiger shark in Tamil Nadu fish market. Photo credit: Marine Photobank

Recognising the drastic decline in shark numbers, the international community called for a moratorium on their capture and finning. India responded to this situation by introducing a ban on fishing for these elasmobranchs, but due to the vociferous protests from Tamil Nadu fishermen, the then Minister for Environment and Forests, A. Raja, who had political roots and aspirations in the state of Tamil Nadu, partially revoked this ban in 2001.

Additionally, the Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, a government body that monitors fishing in Indian waters, recommended that there was scope to increase the exploitation of sharks in Indian waters, despite no existing studies on actual shark populations. Consequently India remains among the top three largest shark fisheries in the world, contributing over 16% of the world’s shark catches.


70,000 tonnes gross underestimate

Tamil Nadu, the most south easterly state in India, remains the stronghold of the traditional shark fishery. More than 90% of the 190 fishermen I spoke to in Southern Tamil Nadu, during a questionnaire survey supported by the Ravi Sankaran Inlaks Fellowship Programme and the National Centre for Biological Sciences, admitted to catching and selling sharks. The fins they sold would reach the final destination, China, through many pathways. Some would pass through Sri Lanka, others through Singapore or Thailand, while still others were sold directly.

Eventually many of these fins would land up in Hong Kong.

The official estimate of shark landings in India averages about 70,000 tonnes per year. However, this is probably a gross underestimate as the FAO has expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of the data provided by the Indian government and the recent TRAFFIC report on shark trade pegs India at much higher rates of fin trade.

Meanwhile, shark fishing continues unabated. Fishermen who use long-lines in the Lakshadweep don’t always target sharks, but don’t hesitate to use the extra source of income that accompanies their mistaken hooking. A source in the Lakshadweep fishery department revealed that there was a recent shark fin catch weighing several tonnes from a single vessel after a week or so at sea. This means that several thousand sharks were killed and discarded or consumed. On the mainland, shark numbers no longer allow for such blatant extermination. The fishermen I spoke to felt that shark numbers, like all the other fish they catch, were on the decline. The reason for this decline was indiscriminate greed, as evinced by another researcher’s observation of a pregnant hammerhead being sold, its stomach slit open to reveal seven dead fetuses.

Despite the grim picture the Central government seems unwilling to take a stand. The ban on shark fishing now covers only ten species of elasmobranchs where some species are not clearly defined. Especially since much of the shark capture occurs in unselective gear such as trawl or gill nets, this ban has not proved effective on field. Further there is no monitoring of the fishery and no accountability on the part of fishermen, who are not forced to report their catches to the government.

The Action Forum for Sustainable Shark Fishery which supported the revocation of the ban on shark fishing raises other important points. The government has no idea about how to replenish shark stocks, further there is no concrete data on shark stocks at present. In a country where over 70,000 tonnes of sharks are landed every year (FAO figures) choosing to overlook this industry, which leaves no paper trail and operates on an apparently “small” scale, is a huge mistake.

1023 Photo Credit: Marcia Moreno-Baez, Marine Photobank

The situation is only complicated by the fact that unsustainable gear, such as trawl nets, has only further marginalised artisanal fishermen, who use more selective gears. By losing their fish catch to industrial fishing, these marginalised fishermen are now forced to look at easy ways to earn money, such as by selling shark fins.

The root of the problem lies in the fact that it is not clear whether fishing should fall within the purview of the Ministry for Environment and Forests (MoEF) or the Ministry for Agriculture (MoA). While the objective of MoEF is protection, the MoA aims to maximize catch and export of marine products. Similarly while marine species listed as threatened according to Indian laws are protected by the laws pertaining to the MoEF, harvest of unlisted species is controlled (not very strictly) by the MoA. These departments are still not clear about jurisdictions and hence their actions do not co-ordinate well. As the survival of sharks is inextricably linked to the marine world around them, focused species level protection makes no headway. There is no way to save sharks without saving their prey, and there is no way to prevent the fishing of one species while allowing indiscriminating gears to pick off anything that comes in their path.