BROWSE COUNTRIES/ TERRITORIES
Lina Joy: A case of state-minded religion
So the people of Thailand want to incorporate Buddhism into their constitution? They should first take a look at what happened to a woman called Lina Joy in their southern neighbour, Malaysia.
Joy, 45, was born Azlina Jailani and brought up a Muslim. At age 26, she converted to Christianity. Eight years later she took the final step and had herself baptised. She also changed her name. She then applied to have both her name and religion changed on her identity card, which in Malaysia forms the base for all official records.
A name change usually takes a few weeks, if one is a non-Muslim. For Joy it took a whole year. But more importantly, she failed to have the word “Islam” changed to “Christianity” on her identity card – the reason being that in Malaysia, all Muslim affairs are governed by the Syariah (Islamic) court, and that court had refused to allow the change.
That was in 1999. By then Joy had fallen in love with a Christian and wanted to marry him. But that was not possible while she remained a Muslim on record as Malaysian laws prohibit marriages between non-Muslims and Muslims.
Joy then started an eight-year campaign of working through the legal system to obtain what she considered to be her right under the constitution, of which
Article 11 does proclaim: “Every person has the right to profess and practise his religion.” Joy sued to have her religion changed in the high court, thus bypassing the Syariah Court. When that failed in 2006 she took the case to the highest judicial body, the Federal Court.
On May 30th, the Federal Court dismissed her appeal in a two-to-one vote. The Chief Justice, Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim, ruled that Joy must have approval from the Syariah Court for the change of her religion.
"You can't at whim and fancy convert from one religion to another," he said, conveniently ignoring the fact that Joy had spent nearly a decade pursuing her Christian faith, which surely under no measure could be called “whim and fancy”.
His decision was supported by another Muslim judge, Alauddin Mohd Sheriff; while the third judge, Richard Malanjum, a non-Muslim, dissented from the judgment. The court’s decision was welcomed by the more than 200 Muslims holding a prayer vigil outside the court room, and loud cries of “Allah-u-Akbar” (God is great) could be heard by those inside the court.
The Federal Court’s decision has further divided the people of Malaysia. It has also sparked concern over the role of the constitution – which in Joy’s case has turned out to be a mere nominal supreme law of the land – under the onslaught of militaristic religion. Malaysia has long been a country where all races could conceivably live together. It is now increasingly polarised. Is that what the people of Thailand want?
Related Stories:
Why the King of Thailand never smiles
Thailand's crown prince: A king in waiting?
Thailand: Where coups still rule
August 2007
You are not logged in:
Login or Register
Login or Register
Lee Han Shih is the founder, publisher and editor of asia! Magazine.
Topics
- Asian Dynasties and History
- Conservation of the Environment
- Definition: Culture
- Economy and Economics
- Food and Recipe
- Geopolitics and Strategic Relations
- Health and Body
- Of Government and Politics
- Religion and Practices
- Social Injustices and Poverty Report
- Society, Class and Division
- Unrest, Conflicts and Wars
Email Marketing by Benchmark Email
For More on Thai Politics
Literature Edwin Khoo Life of My Sisters The AWARE Extraordinary General Meeting Country profiles Debby Ng US military strategy Tycoons Women Friends Without Borders The Work of I.M. Pei Business updates Asia's First Wives India-Pakistan Friendship Barack Obama
Comments
Post new comment